Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, Volume 10, Issue 2, Article 9 (Dec., 2009)
Musa DIKMENLI
Biology student teachers’ ideas about purpose of laboratory work

Previous Contents


References

Bayraktar, S., Erten, S. & Aydogdu, C. (2006). Fen ve teknoloji ogretiminde laboratuvarin onemi ve deneyler. M. Bahar (Ed.), Fen ve teknoloji ogretimi (Science and Technology Instruction) (pp. 219-248). Ankara, PegemA Yayincilik. [in Turkish].

Bencze, L. & Hodson, D. (1999). Changing practice by changing practice: Toward more authentic science and science curriculum development. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(5), 521–539.

Bol, L. & Strage, A. (1996). The contradiction between teachers’ instructional goals and their assessment practices in high school biology courses. Science Education, 80(2), 145–163.

Cardak, O., Onder, K. & Dikmenli, M. (2007). Effect of the usage of laboratory method in primary school education for the achievement of the students’ learning. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 8(2), Article 3. [Online] http://www.ied.edu.hk/apfslt/v8_issue2/cardak/.

Cepni, S. & Ayvaci, H.S. (2006). Laboratuar destekli fen ogretimi yaklasimlari. S. Cepni (Ed.), Fen ve teknoloji ogretimi (Science and technology instruction) (pp. 167–195). Ankara, PegemA Yayincilik. [in Turkish].

Domin, D.S. (2007). Students’ perceptions of when conceptual development occurs during laboratory instruction. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 8(2), 140–152.

Ergin, O., Sahin-Pekmez, E. & Ongel-Erdal, S. (2005). Kuramdan uygulamaya deney yoluyla fen ogretimi. Izmir, Dinazor Kitabevi. [in Turkish].

Freedman, P.M. (1997). Relationship among laboratory instruction, attitude toward science, and achievement in science knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34(4), 343–357.

Hart, C., Mulhall, P., Berry, A., Loughran, J., & Gunstone, R. (2000). What is the purpose of this experiment? Or can students learn something from doing experiments? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(7), 655–675.

Hirvonen, P.E. & Viiri, J. (2002). Physics student teachers’ ideas about the objectives of practical work. Science & Education, 11, 305–316.

Hofstein, A. & Lunetta, V.N. (2003). The laboratory in science education: foundations for the twenty-first century. Science Education, 88(1), 28–54.

Jimenez-Aleixandre, M.P., Rodriguez, A.B. & Duschl, R.A. (2000). ‘Doing the lesson’ or ‘Doing science’: Argument in high school genetics. Science Education, 84(6), 757–792.

Johnstone, A.H. & Al-Shuaili, A. (2001). Learning in the laboratory: some thoughts from the literature. University Chemistry Education, 5, 42–51.

Kang, N.H. & Wallace, C.S. (2005). Secondary science teachers’ use of laboratory activities: Linking epistemological beliefs, goals, and practices. Science Education, 89(1), 140–165.

Lawson, A.E., Clark, B., Cramer-Meldrum, E., Falconer, K.A., Sequist, J.M. & Kwon, Y.-J. (2000). Development of scientific reasoning in college biology: Do two levels of general hypothesis-testing skills exist? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(1), 81–101.

Lazarowitz, R. & Tamir, P. (1994). Research on using laboratory instruction in science. In D.L. Gabel (Ed.), Handbook of research on science teaching and learning (pp. 94–128). New York: Macmillan.

Lord, T. & Orkwiszewski, T. (2006). Moving from didactic to inquiry-based instruction in a science laboratory. The American Biology Teacher, 68(6), 342–345.

Lunetta, V.N. (1998). The school science laboratory: Historical perspectives and centers for contemporary teaching. In: B.J. Fraser & K.G. Tobin (Eds), International handbook of science education. Dordrecht. Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Nott, M. & Wellington, J. (1997). Producing the evidence: Science teachers’ initiations into practical work. Research in Science Education, 27(3), 395–409.

Ottander, C. & Grelsson, G. (2006). Laboratory work: the teachers’ perspective. Journal of Biological Education, 40(3), 113118.

Reid, N. & Shah, I. (2007). The role of laboratory work in university chemistry. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 8(2), 172–185.

Sahin-Pekmez, E., Johnson, P. & Gott, R. (2005). Teachers’ understanding of the nature and purpose of practical work. Research in Science & Technological Education, 23(1), 3–23.

Schwartz, R.S., Lederman, N.G. & Crawford, B.A. (2004). Developing views of nature of science in an authentic context: an explicit approach to bridging the gap between nature of science and scientific inquiry. Science Education, 88(4), 610–645.

Tan, A-L. (2008). Tensions in the biology laboratory: What are they? International Journal of Science Education, 30(12), 1661–1676.

Tobin, K. (1986). Secondary school laboratory activities. International Journal of Science Education, 8(2), 199–211.

Wandersee, J.H., Mintzes, J.J., & Novak, J.D. (1994). Research on alternative conceptions in science. In D.L. Gabel (Ed.), Handbook of research on science teaching and learning (pp. 177–210). New York: Macmillan.

Wilkinson, J. & Ward, M. (1997a). A comparative study of students’ and their teachers’ perceptions of laboratory work in secondary schools. Research in Science Education, 27 (4), 599–610.

Wilkinson, J.W. & Ward, M. (1997b). The purpose and perceived effectiveness of laboratory work in secondary schools. Australian Science Teachers’ Journal, 42(2), 49–55.

Wyatt, S. (2005). Extending inquiry-based learning to include original experimentation. The Journal of General Education, 54(2), 83–89.

Yildirim, A. & Simsek, H. (2005). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri (Qualitative research methods in social sciences). Ankara: Seckin Yayıncılık. [in Turkish].


Copyright (C) 2009 HKIEd APFSLT. Volume 10, Issue 2, Article 9 (Dec., 2009). All Rights Reserved.