Asia-Pacific Forum
on Science Learning and Teaching, Volume 10, Issue 1, Article 3
(June, 2009) |
Abell, S., & Smith, D. (1994). Analytical induction. International Journal of Science Education, 16, 473-487.
Aubusson, P. J., Harrison, A. G., & Ritchie, S. M. (Eds.). (2006). Metaphor and analogy in science education. Dordrecht: Springer.
Ausubel, D. (1968). Educational psychology - a cognitive view. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston INC.
Black, M. (1994). More about metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (pp.19-41). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bloom, J. W. (1992a). Contexts of Meaning and Conceptual Integration: How Children Understand and Learn. In R. A. Duschl & R. J. Hamilton (Eds.), Philosophy of science, cognitive psychology, and educational theory and practice. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Bloom, J. W. (1992b). The development of scientific knowledge in elementary school children: A context of meaning perspective. Science Education, 76(4), 339-413.
Boyd, R. (1993). Metaphor and theory change: What is "metaphor" a metaphor for? In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and Thought (pp.481-532). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cameron, L. (2002). Metaphors in the Learning of Science: a discourse focus. British Educational Research Journal, 28(5), 673-688.
Clark, H. H. (1996). Using language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Clement, J. J. (1998). Expert novice similarities and instruction using analogies. International Journal of Science Education, 20(10), 1271-1286.
Clement, J. J., & Rea-Ramirez , M. A. (2008). Using analogies in science teaching and curriculum: some guidelines. In J. J. Clement & M. A. Rea-Ramirez (Eds.), Model Based Learning and Instruction in Science (pp.215-231). Dordrecht: Springer.
Dewey, J. (1938/1997). Experience and Education. New York: Touchstone.
Duit, R. (1991). On the role of analogies and metaphors in learning science. Science Education, 75(6), 649-672.
Duit, R. (2008). Bibliography STCSE, Students' and teachers' conceptions and science education. IPN, Kiel: http://www.ipn.uni.-kiel.de/aktuell/stcse/stcse.html.
Goodwin, C. (1994). Professional Vision. American Anthropologist, 96(3), 606-633.
Goodwin, C. (1995). Seeing in depth. Social Studies of Science, 25, 237-274.
Hesse, M. (1963). Models and Analogies in Science. London: Sheed & Ward.
Hirsch, R. (1989). Argumentation, Information, and Interaction. Monographs in Linguistics No.7, : Department of Linguistics, Gothenburg University.
Hirsch, R. (1996). The Act of Speaking. In C. Pankow (Ed.), Indexicality: Papers from the symposium "Indexikala Tecken" . University of Göteborg November 1995. SSKKII Report 9604.
Hirsch, R. (1997). Semantic Content and Depth of Intention: A Study in Cognitive Semantics. In W.-A. Liebert, G. Redeker & L. Waugh (Eds.), Discourse and Perspective in Cognitive Linguistics (pp.61-83). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Jakobson, B., & Wickman, P.-O. (2007). Tansformation through language use: Children's sponaneous metaphors in elementary school. Science and Education, 16, 267-289.
Kuhn, T. S. (1993). Metaphor in science. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and Thought (pp.533-542). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kvale, S. (1996). Interviews. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Lausberg, H. (1990). Elemente der Literarischen Rhetorik. Ismaning: Max Hueber Verlag.
Levin, T., & Wagner, T. (2006). In their own words: Understanding student conceptions of writing through their spontaneous metaphors in the science classroom. Instructional Science, 34, 227-278.
Mishler, E. G. (1995). Research Interviewing. Context and narrative. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
Naess, A. (1966). Communication and Argument: Elements of Applied Semantics. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
Rundgren, C.-J. (2006). Att börja tala 'biokemiska' - betydelsen av metaforer och hjälpord för meningsskapande kring proteiner. Nordina. Nordic Studies in Science Education, 1(5), 30-42.
Rundgren, C.-J. (2008). Visual Thinking, Visual Speech - a Semiotic Perspective on Meaning-Making in Molecular Life Science. How visualizations, metaphors and help-words contribute to the formation of knowledge about proteins among upper secondary and tertiary level students. Linköping: Department of Social and Welfare Studies, Linköping University.
Copyright (C) 2009 HKIEd APFSLT. Volume 10, Issue 1, Article 3 (Jun., 2009). All Rights Reserved.